It is possible the Mayor later paid them back, although three years of bank deposits show nothing with Van Hoose as a depositor. I suppose it is even possible he too was a compensated volunteer earning 15% commission for Chamber membership sales like the Moore's & Mullikin's. Isn't it?
Someone at the Chamber penciled in "S.T. Initiative I" on the AmEx statement which could mean Springdale Tomorrow Initiative, but it appears Van Hoose was the only attendee.
Surely the trip didn't have anything to do with his rejection just a month earlier of an offer by a Dallas-based sports investor to privately bankroll Springdale's ballpark, thus derailing the Chamber's pet project and sparing the already overburdened taxpayers from taking on an additional $50 million in debt.
Of course the original news article is no longer available, but a snippet can be located on ballparkdigest.com.
It has been suggested that Van Hoose is married to the sister of the majority owner of the prime ballpark area real estate just waiting to be developed. That's not a conflict of interest, is it?
These are some serious insinuations. Someone explain to me why the board of directors and/or city aren't paying attention?
ReplyDelete/
ReplyDeleteIn Springdale there is no such thing as a conflict of interest.
.
A responsible reporter would call people involved and ask for a comment. My guess you don't want a resonable explaination.
ReplyDeleterdd
This isn't the newspaper, rdd. We no longer have one in Springdale. The "people involved" are more than welcome to "comment".
ReplyDeletePlease do comment Red Dog Dotson. You didn't hesitate on your comments to the paper praising Jim Rollins. We would really love to hear what you have to say. Lay on it on us.
ReplyDelete